Mattern Helps Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Improve Outsourced Administrative Services Including Resource Center & Document and Word Processing Agreements

Based on the West-Coast, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is an Am Law 50 firm who had been in a long-term relationship with two vendors for outsourcing and document processing services provided at its domestic offices. One of the vendors provided services for the majority of the firm’s offices, including traditional outsourced services (production, mail, hospitality, office services, supplies services, and reception), word processing, transcripts services, an administrative resource center (ARC), and multifunction devices (MFDs). The second vendor provided services at two of the firm’s offices for traditional outsourced services and MFDs.

OPPORTUNITY
Based on the West-Coast, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is an Am Law 50 firm who had been in a long-term relationship with two vendors for outsourcing and document processing services provided at its domestic offices. One of the vendors provided services for the majority of the firm’s offices, including traditional outsourced services (production, mail, hospitality, office services, supplies services, and reception), word processing, transcripts services, an administrative resource center (ARC), and multifunction devices (MFDs). The second vendor provided services at two of the firm’s offices for traditional outsourced services and MFDs.

A review of the relationships revealed that the firm was overall pleased with the service performance. However, the firm felt it needed to address its overall financial and contractual situation to ensure terms and conditions were the most competitive on the market and in line with peer firms.

In addition to benchmarking contract competitiveness against the market, the firm desired to increase efficiencies, improve pricing and terms, refresh its MFD fleet, look at alternative pricing models, and find any gaps between current and best practices. Another of the firm’s objectives was to review the MFD equipment. Thus, the focus of the Mattern process was to analyze the current situation and educate the firm on its findings and best practices.

SOLUTION
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe engaged Mattern to do a comprehensive review of services provided by the two vendors for its domestic offices.

Mattern performed a complete assessment of MFD equipment and traditional services at each of the firm’s vendor-staffed offices – ten locations in all. In addition, Mattern did an on-site assessment of the firm’s word processing, ARC, and transcripts services at the off-site location where those functions were housed. Mattern’s review included a comprehensive review of the outsourcing vendor’s MFDs, staffing levels, workflows, and processes at all locations.

Mattern interviewed firm and incumbent vendor staff to document all aspects of operations from execution to overall impressions regarding their success or lack of success. Based on this evaluation, and utilizing its industry knowledge, benchmarks, and long history with law firm operations, Mattern made several recommendations for the firm’s consideration.

Mattern recommended staffing and operational improvements in each office to increase efficiency. Amongst the items that Mattern recommended for traditional services and equipment were possible headcount reductions equating to (25.4%) in overstaffed offices as well as process improvements such as improved hours of operation and right-sizing the MFD fleet.

For word processing, ARC and transcription services, Mattern noted that pivoting away from an hourly rate model for document processing to a fixed management fee could reduce the firm’s costs by 29.5%. Mattern also recommended contractual improvements to bring the firm up to the standards of contemporary contracts as the current contracts were lacking in a few key areas.

RESULTS
After a detailed review of the Mattern report, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe engaged with their incumbent vendor to renew the current services at improved pricing and terms.

Client Comment: “Mattern’s benchmarking and analysis of our outsourcing contract was invaluable. Mattern’s work armed us with the necessary market information to be able to drive a much more competitive renewal and feel comfortable that the negotiations with our current vendor led to a good competitive outcome without needing to take this out to a full competitive bid process.” – Kevin Cash, Former Chief Financial Officer, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP

The procurement of office supplies is back to pre-pandemic levels and firms are once again looking to optimize their spend. After years of decline due to hybrid work and the shift to digital output, the overall dollar spend is back, or in some cases, exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

Establishing and maintaining a successful contract negotiation is a situation in which there needs to be two winners, not a winner and a loser. While every firm wants to procure the best contracts through informed negotiation, it is also important to preserve the long term, industry relationships with the vendors. You’ve got to pick the competitors wisely, and you must know the best practices in your region. To that end, there’s a great deal of strategy involved in an Open RFP; one might say an art.

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

With more than 1,100 lawyers and consulting professionals in 24 offices worldwide, this firm is a leading business and litigation practice with global reach. As is the trend with many successful large firms, this particular one had undergone a merger in 2009 with an established Atlanta-based firm.

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

Best Best & Krieger, LLP is a 180-attorney law firm that has been in business for more than a century. The firm has grown to include several dynamic practice groups across eight offices throughout California.

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Houston-based firm was in the throes of implementing a “work-cell” environment for their secretaries per practice area. The restructuring of staff and office layout required a different output strategy to be deployed in order to provide the tools and technology within close proximity to the work-cells, while also looking to reduce expenses. However, the firm had several expiration dates for their existing multi-function devices, requiring a creative plan for addressing replacements that also substantially improved the convenience and efficiency for the new work-cell environment.

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

This AmLaw 200, Chicago-based firm had taken advantage of outsourcing methods over the last couple of years; however, its current outsourcing and equipment contract was soon to expire. Since the firm renewed with the incumbent vendor the previous five years, they were interested in learning what other service bureaus were providing in the outsourcing marketplace. The firm also desired to determine whether they were staffed appropriately and operating under industry best practices and service levels with competitive pricing.

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

This 250 attorney, Am Law 200, Washington D.C.-based firm had specific areas in which it was struggling; in particular, they were finding it difficult to keep current with technology, flexing to meet demand, and recovering costs for the internal systems and storage related to litigation support services (e-Discovery).

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

This 350 attorney, Am Law 200 firm based in Ohio had decided to outsource their in-sourced back-office operations and multi-function devices (MFDs) on a firm-wide basis five years prior. The contract was expiring and the firm was now considering outsourcing the on-site centralized Records and Information Management functions. As a result, the firm was interested in what other outsourcing companies’ capabilities were in the records space, how they may improve current services to the firm, and whether they had a competitive contract.

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

This 250 attorney, AmLaw 200, Washington D.C.-based firm has 11 offices nationwide. The firm had multiple offsite records storage contracts in place and was interested in investigating cost-savings and efficiencies by consolidating vendors as well as creating a short and long-term strategy to reduce their offsite storage commitments.

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

This 225 attorney, Nashville-based firm was looking to improve outsourcing workflow efficiencies, service level and increase equipment capabilities. The firm had been with its current outsourcing and equipment provider for over a decade and felt that the level of off-site management interaction and proactive presentation of strategic initiatives were minimal.

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings