top of page

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Five years ago, D’Aquila engaged Mattern to streamline the firm’s outsourced facilities management processes. During that initial engagement, Mattern’s consultants were able to achieve savings of close to 23% per month for the firm, while consolidating vendors to a single provider and streamlining equipment platforms and contract expirations. “We were very pleased with those results,” says, D’Aquila, “which is why BBK called upon the consultants of Mattern to spearhead a new project for BBK, tackling our office supplies contract.”

Phase I and II Engagement in Office Supplies
For the firm’s office supplies, Mattern performed Phase I and II analyses in which there was an in-depth review of BBK’s invoices, contracts in addition to onsite visits to review current workflow processes. These custom analyses were then benchmarked and also provided the basis for Mattern’s recommendations.

BBK moved forward with an open RFP in the office supplies situation, selected a new vendor from the field of competitors, Office Max. Mattern was able to achieve approximately 10% in monthly savings firmwide for their office supplies. Because of these excellent results, BBK decided to move forward with the Mattern Phase III offering.

The Decision to Move Forward with Phase III
The Phase III offering from Mattern includes implementation oversight, monitoring and maintenance of a firm’s vendor contracts. “Best Best & Krieger wanted to maximize the opportunities in our office supplies contracts; however, our firm doesn’t have the resources to scrutinize contracts on an ongoing basis at this level. Having Mattern engaged for the Phase III meant our firm would have expert advice at our disposal throughout the lifecycle of the office supplies contract,” says D’Aquila.

For the firm’s contract with Office Max, Phase III entailed oversight of the vendor transition to Office Max, including firm-announcement language, coordinating firm-vendor conference calls and meetings; invoice monitoring and reconciliation specifically to ensure that the pricing was in-line with contract and pricing adjustments.

“Simply put, it’s a second pair of eyes looking at these things –an expert second pair of eyes. Mattern’s consultants are so well versed on our particular contract that they are able to suggest strategic recommendations based upon pricing fluctuations, or catch discrepancies very easily. The bottom line is BBK wants to maximize cost-efficiencies and optimize the value of our contracts, and with Mattern in place, we have the expert manpower to do just that.”

Mattern performs ongoing reviews and reports on accuracy in invoicing; on target run rates, ensuring these are being met to prevent price increases; optimizing contract vs. non-contract spend and making recommendations if supplies lists need calibrated to ensure the most cost-effective purchasing for firm as well as non-contract discounts to monitor for any required adjustments; and finally, reporting on purchasing trends to determine if any action items need to be addressed for budgetary purposes. As with the Phase I & II aspects of the project, the Phase III services cost the firm zero additional dollars due to the fact that Mattern’s fees were reimbursed by the vendor.”

THE RESULTS
“The bottom line goal of having Mattern in the picture is to consolidate, save costs, become more efficient and provide consistencies throughout our nine locations,” D’Aquila continues to say. “To be able to do this at no extra cost to our firm is clearly a win-win for Best Best and Krieger.”

In office supplies, Mattern’s consultants regularly review invoices for accurate pricing and, based on the firm’s concern regarding price fluctuations and lower advertised pricing for some of BBK’s core items by other providers, Mattern has additionally conducted a purchasing analysis to determine the impact to the firm’s contractual agreement if certain purchases were made elsewhere versus through Office Max – as well as allowing that data to illustrate what the most advantageous path for the firm would be.

“The Mattern team also provides spend per office and spend per attorney analyses—and all of these oversights by their expert consultants are very beneficial strategic tools for the firm’s budgeting,” includes D’Aquila.

THE TAKEAWAYS
“At the end of the day, it’s good practice to ensure contractual terms are met—and the consultants at Mattern are really good at that,” says D’Aquila. “Their consultants even participate in quarterly vendor presentations—keeping everyone on task.”

D’Aquila concludes, “Because of engaging Mattern for the Phase III, our firm is more pleased with our service contracts, we have also achieved significantly more effective contracts.

“Over the lifecycle of the engagement, the consultants of Mattern bring things to our attention we may have overlooked and act as an expert resource for any questions we may have, whether it be a strategic or price negotiation point in one of our contracts. I consider their team to be an invaluable resource.”

The procurement of office supplies is back to pre-pandemic levels and firms are once again looking to optimize their spend.  After years of decline due to hybrid work and the shift to digital output, the overall dollar spend is back, or in some cases, exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

Establishing and maintaining a successful contract negotiation is a situation in which there needs to be two winners, not a winner and a loser. While every firm wants to procure the best contracts through informed negotiation, it is also important to preserve the long term, industry relationships with the vendors. You’ve got to pick the competitors wisely, and you must know the best practices in your region. To that end, there’s a great deal of strategy involved in an Open RFP; one might say an art.

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

With more than 1,100 lawyers and consulting professionals in 24 offices worldwide, this firm is a leading business and litigation practice with global reach. As is the trend with many successful large firms, this particular one had undergone a merger in 2009 with an established Atlanta-based firm.

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

Best Best & Krieger, LLP is a 180-attorney law firm that has been in business for more than a century. The firm has grown to include several dynamic practice groups across eight offices throughout California.

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Houston-based firm was in the throes of implementing a “work-cell” environment for their secretaries per practice area. The restructuring of staff and office layout required a different output strategy to be deployed in order to provide the tools and technology within close proximity to the work-cells, while also looking to reduce expenses. However, the firm had several expiration dates for their existing multi-function devices, requiring a creative plan for addressing replacements that also substantially improved the convenience and efficiency for the new work-cell environment.

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

This AmLaw 200, Chicago-based firm had taken advantage of outsourcing methods over the last couple of years; however, its current outsourcing and equipment contract was soon to expire. Since the firm renewed with the incumbent vendor the previous five years, they were interested in learning what other service bureaus were providing in the outsourcing marketplace. The firm also desired to determine whether they were staffed appropriately and operating under industry best practices and service levels with competitive pricing.

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

This 250 attorney, Am Law 200, Washington D.C.-based firm had specific areas in which it was struggling; in particular, they were finding it difficult to keep current with technology, flexing to meet demand, and recovering costs for the internal systems and storage related to litigation support services (e-Discovery).

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

This 350 attorney, Am Law 200 firm based in Ohio had decided to outsource their in-sourced back-office operations and multi-function devices (MFDs) on a firm-wide basis five years prior. The contract was expiring and the firm was now considering outsourcing the on-site centralized Records and Information Management functions. As a result, the firm was interested in what other outsourcing companies’ capabilities were in the records space, how they may improve current services to the firm, and whether they had a competitive contract.

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

This 250 attorney, AmLaw 200, Washington D.C.-based firm has 11 offices nationwide. The firm had multiple offsite records storage contracts in place and was interested in investigating cost-savings and efficiencies by consolidating vendors as well as creating a short and long-term strategy to reduce their offsite storage commitments.

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

This 225 attorney, Nashville-based firm was looking to improve outsourcing workflow efficiencies, service level and increase equipment capabilities. The firm had been with its current outsourcing and equipment provider for over a decade and felt that the level of off-site management interaction and proactive presentation of strategic initiatives were minimal.

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Kansas City-based firm was looking to implement changes in production workflow in order to maximize efficiencies and substantially reduce consumption and reliance on paper.  With the expiration of its current Canon Multi-Function Device (MFD) fleet pending as well as an aging printer fleet, the firm’s operations and IT teams were seeking a comprehensive solution to meet the current and future needs of the firm.

AmLaw 200 Firm Leverages Technology & Equipment to Improve Workflow, Saves $1 Million over 5 Years

AmLaw 200 Firm Leverages Technology & Equipment to Improve Workflow, Saves $1 Million over 5 Years

More Case Studies

bottom of page