Mattern Leads Am Law 200 Firm Through Administrative Services Restructure

An Am Law 200 firm, with 300 attorneys across multiple offices in the continental US, sought out Mattern's expertise to assess the efficiency of their administrative support structure and devise a strategic plan for its future.

OPPORTUNITY
An Am Law 200 firm, with 300 attorneys across multiple offices in the continental US, sought out Mattern's expertise to assess the efficiency of their administrative support structure and devise a strategic plan for its future. The firm faced challenges such as high secretary-to-attorney ratios, inconsistent processes across offices, limited centralized resources, and scant administrative support in smaller offices. Each office operated somewhat independently, despite the firm's adoption of hybrid work arrangements for both attorneys and administrative staff. This prompted a pressing need to revamp their administrative framework to better serve their legal team. Although the firm had initiated some measures to manage the effects of a dispersed workforce, they enlisted Mattern to conduct an all-encompassing review of their administrative support and propose improvements to better assist their attorneys.

PROCESS/SOLUTIONS
The firm lacked comprehensive data on the daily activities of their administrative staff and the extent to which attorneys were handling administrative tasks themselves, partly due to hybrid work requirements and limited administrative support availability. To address this, Mattern employed RevelationLegal, a proprietary survey tool tailored for law firms by legal administrators. This tool surveyed all personnel within the firm to identify their daily tasks and estimated costs based on employee salaries. This approach provided Mattern with valuable insights to estimate costs associated with key activities and pinpoint areas where non-billable hours could be reallocated to increase attorneys' billable hours.

To gain deeper understanding of the firm's operations, workflows, needs, and culture, Mattern conducted on-site focus groups with each practice group and held interviews with key personnel. The aim was to gather feedback from various stakeholders within the firm, comprehensively evaluating support from both attorneys' and administrative professionals' perspectives and identifying unique needs within each practice group.

RESULTS
Drawing from the data collected through RevelationLegal, insights from focus groups, and information provided by the firm, Mattern drafted and presented a Support Services Consultation Report to the firm. This report encapsulated key feedback from staff and offered recommendations to enhance support services and improve operational efficiency.

Mattern's recommendations encompassed various initiatives, including centralizing certain aspects of attorney support services, redirecting tasks identified during onsite visits and through RevelationLegal, addressing obstacles attorneys encounter when seeking support, streamlining the support request process, ensuring equitable workloads for administrative staff to prevent burnout, establishing career paths and succession plans for administrative personnel, and increased billable hours for attorneys.

In addition to the above, Mattern also provides projected costs if the firm wishes to outsource these functions along with the projected costs to modify in-house operation. In this situation, the firm would conservatively realize savings in excess of 20% if either path was chosen. When the firm went through the pros and cons of the different solutions that Mattern compiled, the firm was enamored with the benefits of outsourcing these services and is currently heading down that path.

CLIENT SUCCESS
In the end, based on the exceptional results achieved, the Mattern team was pleased to receive a Net Promotor Scale (NPS) score of 10 on a scale of 1-10 from the firm’s Executive Committee.

The procurement of office supplies is back to pre-pandemic levels and firms are once again looking to optimize their spend. After years of decline due to hybrid work and the shift to digital output, the overall dollar spend is back, or in some cases, exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

Establishing and maintaining a successful contract negotiation is a situation in which there needs to be two winners, not a winner and a loser. While every firm wants to procure the best contracts through informed negotiation, it is also important to preserve the long term, industry relationships with the vendors. You’ve got to pick the competitors wisely, and you must know the best practices in your region. To that end, there’s a great deal of strategy involved in an Open RFP; one might say an art.

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

With more than 1,100 lawyers and consulting professionals in 24 offices worldwide, this firm is a leading business and litigation practice with global reach. As is the trend with many successful large firms, this particular one had undergone a merger in 2009 with an established Atlanta-based firm.

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

Best Best & Krieger, LLP is a 180-attorney law firm that has been in business for more than a century. The firm has grown to include several dynamic practice groups across eight offices throughout California.

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Houston-based firm was in the throes of implementing a “work-cell” environment for their secretaries per practice area. The restructuring of staff and office layout required a different output strategy to be deployed in order to provide the tools and technology within close proximity to the work-cells, while also looking to reduce expenses. However, the firm had several expiration dates for their existing multi-function devices, requiring a creative plan for addressing replacements that also substantially improved the convenience and efficiency for the new work-cell environment.

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

This AmLaw 200, Chicago-based firm had taken advantage of outsourcing methods over the last couple of years; however, its current outsourcing and equipment contract was soon to expire. Since the firm renewed with the incumbent vendor the previous five years, they were interested in learning what other service bureaus were providing in the outsourcing marketplace. The firm also desired to determine whether they were staffed appropriately and operating under industry best practices and service levels with competitive pricing.

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

This 250 attorney, Am Law 200, Washington D.C.-based firm had specific areas in which it was struggling; in particular, they were finding it difficult to keep current with technology, flexing to meet demand, and recovering costs for the internal systems and storage related to litigation support services (e-Discovery).

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

This 350 attorney, Am Law 200 firm based in Ohio had decided to outsource their in-sourced back-office operations and multi-function devices (MFDs) on a firm-wide basis five years prior. The contract was expiring and the firm was now considering outsourcing the on-site centralized Records and Information Management functions. As a result, the firm was interested in what other outsourcing companies’ capabilities were in the records space, how they may improve current services to the firm, and whether they had a competitive contract.

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

This 250 attorney, AmLaw 200, Washington D.C.-based firm has 11 offices nationwide. The firm had multiple offsite records storage contracts in place and was interested in investigating cost-savings and efficiencies by consolidating vendors as well as creating a short and long-term strategy to reduce their offsite storage commitments.

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

This 225 attorney, Nashville-based firm was looking to improve outsourcing workflow efficiencies, service level and increase equipment capabilities. The firm had been with its current outsourcing and equipment provider for over a decade and felt that the level of off-site management interaction and proactive presentation of strategic initiatives were minimal.

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings