Mattern Helps Holland & Knight Reduce Current Costs by 34.5% and Permanent Withdrawal Fees by $1 Million While Incorporating Information Governance Goals

Holland & Knight, an Am Law 100 firm with 24 locations and 650,000 cubic feet of off-site records storage, had consolidated their off-site holdings with a national provider. While leadership was generally pleased with the services of their selected provider, it was unclear how their current pricing and contract terms stood up against the marketplace.

OPPORTUNITY
Holland & Knight, an Am Law 100 firm with 24 locations and 650,000 cubic feet of off-site records storage, had consolidated their off-site holdings with a national provider. While leadership was generally pleased with the services of their selected provider, it was unclear how their current pricing and contract terms stood up against the marketplace.

In addition, the firm’s leadership was in the process of implementing an Information Governance (IG) program and desired to drive down their off-site holdings as part of this and, as a result, sought: 1. An expert review of their IG policy and retention schedules to ensure all critical items were addressed and benchmarked against industry peer best practices, and 2. Ensure their contract terms aligned strategically with this policy as well as reflected the most competitive and cost-effective destruction costs.

Based upon its evaluation and utilizing its industry knowledge, benchmarks, and long history with off-site records providers, Mattern claimed they could help the firm negotiate its last off-site records contract ever. Holland & Knight was incentivized to take advantage of a complimentary offer from Mattern to benchmark their current off-site records storage contract that was due to expire in 18 months and a pending renewal. Mattern’s benchmarking analysis identified the following:

Storage, service, and shredding costs were higher than the Mattern Benchmarks
The following contractual terms could be improved:
- Annual increases
- Defined contract termination process
- A scorecard process with performance standards
- Destruction allowances and declining permanent withdrawal fees
- Minimum storage clauses
- After reviewing the findings, firm leadership retained Mattern to review their IG policy and manage a request for proposal (RFP) for their off-site records storage.

Leadership found Mattern’s commitment - that this would be the last off-site contract they would sign, along with the guarantee that all fees and expenses would be reimbursed to the firm by the winning service provider - attractive.

PROCESS
After a review of the providers that could service Holland & Knight, Mattern and the firm crafted an RFP that addressed key points from the analysis and elected to send the RFP to three national providers and the incumbent. Once the firm approved the RFP, Mattern managed the analysis of the responses, clarifications, interviews, and another round of pricing. After the completion of the process, the firm elected to award the new ten-year off-site storage and shredding contract to a new provider.

RESULT
The new contract absorbed the entire cost of the permanent withdrawal fees from the incumbent and improved the following:
- Lowered the firm’s storage, service, and shredding costs by an estimated 34.5%
- Reduced their permanent withdrawal fees by close to $1 million dollars
- Allowed the firm to destroy up to 96% of their off-site holdings over the course of the agreement
- Kept rates locked for the first 3 years with sporadic minimal increases
- Included performance standards with penalties for non-compliance and a detailed termination process

CLIENT TAKEAWAY
When leadership at Holland & Knight was asked whether they would recommend Mattern to a colleague, the client responded as follows. “What Mattern has been able to achieve on this project goes far above and beyond our expectations. Their characterization from the onset of the goal being that this will be the last records storage contract Holland & Knight would ever have to negotiate was very compelling, although I absolutely did not believe we would be leaving our incumbent. Having Mattern run the entire RFP process, the terms and pricing they were able to secure, and the availability of Mattern to assist in the transition, more than convinced me of the wisdom of this decision. I would without hesitation recommend Mattern to anyone evaluating their offsite storage options.”

As to the IG assessment “Our objective in this project was to obtain an outside expert’s evaluation of our IG operations…. the assessment acted as a validation of our progress and internal understanding of future plans and provides some additional tools for prioritizing elements of our program going forward.”

Like so many firms, the Firm had boxes of paper records that hadn’t been touched in years. The attorneys responsible had retired or moved on, and the boxes of records lay idle.

Mattern Assists Law Firm in Unraveling Decades of Paper Records and Rebuilding Information Governance Strategy

The procurement of office supplies is back to pre-pandemic levels and firms are once again looking to optimize their spend. After years of decline due to hybrid work and the shift to digital output, the overall dollar spend is back, or in some cases, exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

Establishing and maintaining a successful contract negotiation is a situation in which there needs to be two winners, not a winner and a loser. While every firm wants to procure the best contracts through informed negotiation, it is also important to preserve the long term, industry relationships with the vendors. You’ve got to pick the competitors wisely, and you must know the best practices in your region. To that end, there’s a great deal of strategy involved in an Open RFP; one might say an art.

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

With more than 1,100 lawyers and consulting professionals in 24 offices worldwide, this firm is a leading business and litigation practice with global reach. As is the trend with many successful large firms, this particular one had undergone a merger in 2009 with an established Atlanta-based firm.

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

Best Best & Krieger, LLP is a 180-attorney law firm that has been in business for more than a century. The firm has grown to include several dynamic practice groups across eight offices throughout California.

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Houston-based firm was in the throes of implementing a “work-cell” environment for their secretaries per practice area. The restructuring of staff and office layout required a different output strategy to be deployed in order to provide the tools and technology within close proximity to the work-cells, while also looking to reduce expenses. However, the firm had several expiration dates for their existing multi-function devices, requiring a creative plan for addressing replacements that also substantially improved the convenience and efficiency for the new work-cell environment.

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

This AmLaw 200, Chicago-based firm had taken advantage of outsourcing methods over the last couple of years; however, its current outsourcing and equipment contract was soon to expire. Since the firm renewed with the incumbent vendor the previous five years, they were interested in learning what other service bureaus were providing in the outsourcing marketplace. The firm also desired to determine whether they were staffed appropriately and operating under industry best practices and service levels with competitive pricing.

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

This 250 attorney, Am Law 200, Washington D.C.-based firm had specific areas in which it was struggling; in particular, they were finding it difficult to keep current with technology, flexing to meet demand, and recovering costs for the internal systems and storage related to litigation support services (e-Discovery).

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

This 350 attorney, Am Law 200 firm based in Ohio had decided to outsource their in-sourced back-office operations and multi-function devices (MFDs) on a firm-wide basis five years prior. The contract was expiring and the firm was now considering outsourcing the on-site centralized Records and Information Management functions. As a result, the firm was interested in what other outsourcing companies’ capabilities were in the records space, how they may improve current services to the firm, and whether they had a competitive contract.

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

This 250 attorney, AmLaw 200, Washington D.C.-based firm has 11 offices nationwide. The firm had multiple offsite records storage contracts in place and was interested in investigating cost-savings and efficiencies by consolidating vendors as well as creating a short and long-term strategy to reduce their offsite storage commitments.

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage