top of page

Mattern Leads Marshall Dennehey Negotiations to Avoid 20% Price Escalation in Offsite Records Storage Vendor Renewal Offer

Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C., is an Am Law 200 firm with 500 attorneys across 20 offices and headquarters in Philadelphia. In 2019, firm leadership approached Mattern to assist with its offsite records storage services.

OPPORTUNITY
Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C., is an Am Law 200 firm with 500 attorneys across 20 offices and headquarters in Philadelphia. In 2019, firm leadership approached Mattern to assist with its offsite records storage services.

The firm had been in a relationship with its service provider for some time; however, as the end of the current contract term neared, the service provider submitted a renewal offer which increased the firm’s costs by 20% with the justification that the firm’s current pricing was well below market and did not account for rising fuel costs.

Marshall Dennehey’s leadership preferred to avoid such a significant increase in costs and, therefore, sought the assistance of Mattern who had negotiated the contract terms now in effect with the incumbent vendor. By engaging Mattern, leadership wanted to--at minimum--maintain or improve upon the already favorable terms and conditions of its current contract and improve upon the renewal offering pricing as submitted by the service provider.

PROCESS
Mattern performed a comprehensive review of the firm’s offsite records contract with the service provider, as well as a detailed review of costs.

Based upon its evaluation and utilizing its industry knowledge, benchmarks, and long history with offsite records providers, Mattern was able to make key recommendations to firm leadership to improve upon the current offer from the service provider while maintaining or improving upon the contractual situation. This included ensuring a primary contact point for the firm to ensure their destruction needs were tended to, and annual destruction allotments to fit the firm’s disposition schedule.

Mattern and the firm’s leadership then collaborated to tailor a unique Request for Proposal (RFP) which captured the key points from the evaluation process while meeting the firm’s objectives. Mattern was subsequently able to guide the firm through a successful RFP process, award, and contract negotiations.

RESULT
Mattern worked with the firm’s leadership and the service provider to improve upon the initial pricing offer and secure a much more reasonable renewal.

In addition, the service provider agreed to provide the firm with 7,500 c.f. of destruction in year one of the agreement, and 5,000 c.f. annually thereafter. The service provider also agreed to provide the firm with six months of free receiving and entry.

From a contractual perspective, Mattern was able to retain all the favorable terms and conditions from the previous contract. The service provider also re-structured their relationship with the firm to ensure a reliable point of contact.
As part of the firm’s new contract, the firm received the following terms:
- A single, firm-wide agreement.
- Avoidance of a 20% pricing increase for storage and services.
- Assistance with destruction via allotments.
- Reasonable retrieval and destruction rates.
- Fixed costs for year 2 through 4 of the agreement. 2% fixed rate increases year over year thereafter.
- Agreement to penalty-based service level agreements.
- As a result of Mattern’s process, the firm was able to enter into a firm-friendly contract that guaranteed they would be able to meet their short and long-term inventory reduction goals.

At the end of the engagement, Marianne Boyne, the firm’s Director of Administrative Services was enthusiastic about the value Mattern brought to the process, stating:

“Our firm is extremely pleased with the services provided by Mattern – Very detail oriented, comprehensive and consistently covers our firm’s best interests. Additionally, very professional and pleasant to work with.”

The procurement of office supplies is back to pre-pandemic levels and firms are once again looking to optimize their spend.  After years of decline due to hybrid work and the shift to digital output, the overall dollar spend is back, or in some cases, exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

Establishing and maintaining a successful contract negotiation is a situation in which there needs to be two winners, not a winner and a loser. While every firm wants to procure the best contracts through informed negotiation, it is also important to preserve the long term, industry relationships with the vendors. You’ve got to pick the competitors wisely, and you must know the best practices in your region. To that end, there’s a great deal of strategy involved in an Open RFP; one might say an art.

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

With more than 1,100 lawyers and consulting professionals in 24 offices worldwide, this firm is a leading business and litigation practice with global reach. As is the trend with many successful large firms, this particular one had undergone a merger in 2009 with an established Atlanta-based firm.

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

Best Best & Krieger, LLP is a 180-attorney law firm that has been in business for more than a century. The firm has grown to include several dynamic practice groups across eight offices throughout California.

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Houston-based firm was in the throes of implementing a “work-cell” environment for their secretaries per practice area. The restructuring of staff and office layout required a different output strategy to be deployed in order to provide the tools and technology within close proximity to the work-cells, while also looking to reduce expenses. However, the firm had several expiration dates for their existing multi-function devices, requiring a creative plan for addressing replacements that also substantially improved the convenience and efficiency for the new work-cell environment.

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

This AmLaw 200, Chicago-based firm had taken advantage of outsourcing methods over the last couple of years; however, its current outsourcing and equipment contract was soon to expire. Since the firm renewed with the incumbent vendor the previous five years, they were interested in learning what other service bureaus were providing in the outsourcing marketplace. The firm also desired to determine whether they were staffed appropriately and operating under industry best practices and service levels with competitive pricing.

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

This 250 attorney, Am Law 200, Washington D.C.-based firm had specific areas in which it was struggling; in particular, they were finding it difficult to keep current with technology, flexing to meet demand, and recovering costs for the internal systems and storage related to litigation support services (e-Discovery).

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

This 350 attorney, Am Law 200 firm based in Ohio had decided to outsource their in-sourced back-office operations and multi-function devices (MFDs) on a firm-wide basis five years prior. The contract was expiring and the firm was now considering outsourcing the on-site centralized Records and Information Management functions. As a result, the firm was interested in what other outsourcing companies’ capabilities were in the records space, how they may improve current services to the firm, and whether they had a competitive contract.

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

This 250 attorney, AmLaw 200, Washington D.C.-based firm has 11 offices nationwide. The firm had multiple offsite records storage contracts in place and was interested in investigating cost-savings and efficiencies by consolidating vendors as well as creating a short and long-term strategy to reduce their offsite storage commitments.

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

This 225 attorney, Nashville-based firm was looking to improve outsourcing workflow efficiencies, service level and increase equipment capabilities. The firm had been with its current outsourcing and equipment provider for over a decade and felt that the level of off-site management interaction and proactive presentation of strategic initiatives were minimal.

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Kansas City-based firm was looking to implement changes in production workflow in order to maximize efficiencies and substantially reduce consumption and reliance on paper.  With the expiration of its current Canon Multi-Function Device (MFD) fleet pending as well as an aging printer fleet, the firm’s operations and IT teams were seeking a comprehensive solution to meet the current and future needs of the firm.

AmLaw 200 Firm Leverages Technology & Equipment to Improve Workflow, Saves $1 Million over 5 Years

AmLaw 200 Firm Leverages Technology & Equipment to Improve Workflow, Saves $1 Million over 5 Years

More Case Studies

bottom of page