Mattern Helps Am Law 200 Firm Enhance Value of Offsite Records Contract with Ongoing Contract Compliance

This Am Law 200 firm with 312 attorneys in 18 offices engaged Mattern in 2014 to analyze and make recommendations to improve the firm’s offsite records and ultimately lead a Request for Proposal (RFP) process and contract negotiation.

BACKGROUND
This Am Law 200 firm with 312 attorneys in 18 offices engaged Mattern in 2014 to analyze and make recommendations to improve the firm’s offsite records and ultimately lead a Request for Proposal (RFP) process and contract negotiation. As a result, Mattern was able to identify a strategy to consolidate the firm’s six (6) service providers to one (1). After several rounds of pricing, vendor interviews, and negotiation of terms, the firm chose Recall to provide service to all their locations and gained these benefits:
- A 24% reduction in costs
- Consolidation of service providers
- $201,554 in permanent withdraw charges covered by Recall
- No permanent withdrawal fees for the ten (10) year contract
- Reimbursement from Recall to offset Mattern’s fees including Phase III – Contract Compliance

Pleased with their significantly improved offsite records contract, leadership engaged Mattern to continue to monitor the implementation of the contract and ensure the firm is realizing the full value of the new contract—a service Mattern calls Phase III – Contract Compliance.

Contract Compliance Wins

About midway through the first year of the engagement, Iron Mountain merged with Recall and became the firm’s service provider and Mattern’s Contract Compliance services were pivotal. Mattern oversaw the implementation and transfer, prepared all appropriate implementation documentation/communications (i.e., notification to vendors and to firm’s internal staff), and coordinated all necessary implementation requirements with all offices.

Over a ten-week period, Mattern successfully ensured a smooth transition with no interruption in service or invoicing, relieving the firm of all unnecessary burdens.

Following the successful and seamless transfer to Iron Mountain, Mattern’s Contract Compliance services continued to encompass:
- Monitor pricing and reconcile monthly invoices during contracted period—as well as for the incumbent vendor until transfers are completed.
- Provide an annual Contract Compliance Report to determine that all terms, conditions, and performance standards of the contract are being adhered to on a consistent basis.
- Provide year-over-year data that includes the status of firm’s spend, storage levels, use of destruction incentives, and service provider compliance.
- Serve as point-of-contact for all contract-related questions for the firm and review any necessary addenda to the agreement for the firm’s approval.
- Assist the firm with any vendor performance issue which might arise during the term of the new agreement and serve as mediator to successfully resolve such situations.

RESULTS
As a result of Mattern’s monitoring of the offsite records contract with Iron Mountain, $14,149 in overcharges/invoicing errors have been discovered and the firm has realized over $750 in credits for missed service levels.

From contract inception to now, the firm’s offsite storage volume has decreased by 18% resulting in savings in excess of $90,000 in storage costs. The destruction incentive that was negotiated into the contract has resulted in over $88,000 in savings to date. In addition, the firm continues to receive reimbursement of Mattern’s fees to cover the cost of the Phase III – Contract Compliance.

The procurement of office supplies is back to pre-pandemic levels and firms are once again looking to optimize their spend. After years of decline due to hybrid work and the shift to digital output, the overall dollar spend is back, or in some cases, exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

Establishing and maintaining a successful contract negotiation is a situation in which there needs to be two winners, not a winner and a loser. While every firm wants to procure the best contracts through informed negotiation, it is also important to preserve the long term, industry relationships with the vendors. You’ve got to pick the competitors wisely, and you must know the best practices in your region. To that end, there’s a great deal of strategy involved in an Open RFP; one might say an art.

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

With more than 1,100 lawyers and consulting professionals in 24 offices worldwide, this firm is a leading business and litigation practice with global reach. As is the trend with many successful large firms, this particular one had undergone a merger in 2009 with an established Atlanta-based firm.

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

Best Best & Krieger, LLP is a 180-attorney law firm that has been in business for more than a century. The firm has grown to include several dynamic practice groups across eight offices throughout California.

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Houston-based firm was in the throes of implementing a “work-cell” environment for their secretaries per practice area. The restructuring of staff and office layout required a different output strategy to be deployed in order to provide the tools and technology within close proximity to the work-cells, while also looking to reduce expenses. However, the firm had several expiration dates for their existing multi-function devices, requiring a creative plan for addressing replacements that also substantially improved the convenience and efficiency for the new work-cell environment.

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

This AmLaw 200, Chicago-based firm had taken advantage of outsourcing methods over the last couple of years; however, its current outsourcing and equipment contract was soon to expire. Since the firm renewed with the incumbent vendor the previous five years, they were interested in learning what other service bureaus were providing in the outsourcing marketplace. The firm also desired to determine whether they were staffed appropriately and operating under industry best practices and service levels with competitive pricing.

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

This 250 attorney, Am Law 200, Washington D.C.-based firm had specific areas in which it was struggling; in particular, they were finding it difficult to keep current with technology, flexing to meet demand, and recovering costs for the internal systems and storage related to litigation support services (e-Discovery).

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

This 350 attorney, Am Law 200 firm based in Ohio had decided to outsource their in-sourced back-office operations and multi-function devices (MFDs) on a firm-wide basis five years prior. The contract was expiring and the firm was now considering outsourcing the on-site centralized Records and Information Management functions. As a result, the firm was interested in what other outsourcing companies’ capabilities were in the records space, how they may improve current services to the firm, and whether they had a competitive contract.

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

This 250 attorney, AmLaw 200, Washington D.C.-based firm has 11 offices nationwide. The firm had multiple offsite records storage contracts in place and was interested in investigating cost-savings and efficiencies by consolidating vendors as well as creating a short and long-term strategy to reduce their offsite storage commitments.

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

This 225 attorney, Nashville-based firm was looking to improve outsourcing workflow efficiencies, service level and increase equipment capabilities. The firm had been with its current outsourcing and equipment provider for over a decade and felt that the level of off-site management interaction and proactive presentation of strategic initiatives were minimal.

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings