top of page

Chamberlain Achieves 0$ Dollar Permanent Withdrawal Fee and 40% Savings with New Off-site Records Vendor

This Philadelphia-based, AmLaw 100 firm has over 650 attorneys in 15 offices.

Historically, the firm's back office equipment decisions had been decentralized, providing a great deal of autonomy to each office to select equipment and service providers that best suited each offices’ needs.

Headquartered in Houston, Chamberlain Hrdlicka is a highly-regarded law firm with over 135 attorneys with offices in Atlanta, San Antonio and Philadelphia.

BACKGROUND
Headquartered in Houston, Chamberlain Hrdlicka is a highly-regarded law firm with over 135 attorneys with offices in Atlanta, San Antonio and Philadelphia.

Sherry Laughery has been Chamberlain Hrdlicka’s Director of Client Intake and Records for over two decades. During that time, the firm had essentially remained with one major provider for its off-site records storage while other factors changed: the firm grew, opened new office locations and the vendor changed hands more than once. Over time, these developments resulted in an off-site records situation that was less than ideal: multiple vendors across offices and numerous contracts with variable terms ─ managing and tracking vendors, contracts and invoices had ballooned into an unwieldy process.

Improving Chamberlain Hrdlicka’s records situation, standardizing contracts, schedules and providers was a priority for Laughery, but current contract terms and conditions made change prohibitive. John Meredith, the firm’s Chief Operating Officer, proposed that an unbiased consultancy could add substantial value to the firm’s process by opening the relationship to a market investigation; in this way, the firm could gain a neutral assessment of their storage needs while discovering potential solutions. This is when Meredith encountered Mattern at an industry event. Meredith comments, “I knew that the experience Mattern brought to the process would be well worth the investment.”

RADICAL REDUCTION OF PERMANENT WITHDRAWAL FEES
Mattern was selected by firm leadership to spearhead the project. Several key objectives were front and center for Chamberlain Hrdlicka’s new off-site records storage vendor contract: to align the firm with best practices for destruction, services and rates; to update the firm’s contracts with terms and conditions that would reflect industry standards and allow the firm to manipulate its holdings in a cost-effective and reasonable manner. The top priorities for Mattern were to engage with a single, firm-wide off-site records storage provider, improve the customer-service aspect of that relationship, and enable the firm to achieve its long-term goal of drastically scaling down off-site storage by radically reducing permanent withdrawal fees.

“I didn’t think it was possible, but Mattern’s lead consultant on the project, Ben Schmidt, felt we could achieve this for the firm,” says Laughery. Mattern moved forward on the project, starting with a comprehensive review of the firm’s off-site records contracts and service provider relationships, as well as an on-site assessment at the Houston office to evaluate the firm’s records processes.

OFF-SITE RECORDS EXPERTISE
Based upon its evaluation, and utilizing its industry knowledge, benchmarks, and long history with off-site records, Mattern was able to make key recommendations for Chamberlain Hrdlicka’s consideration, including how to align destruction rates, permanent withdrawal terms and the firm’s long-term records goals.

Six vendors, including the incumbent, expressed an interest in participating in the outsourcing RFP, and Mattern was able to guide the firm through the process; Ben Schmidt negotiated several excellent proposals for Chamberlain Hrdlicka to review, which narrowed the field to three competitors. “Mattern’s vast experience and knowledge of benchmarks assured us throughout the process,” states Laughery. “They knew what accommodations were possible and made those happen.”

Mattern and the firm worked in concert to tailor a unique RFP which captured the findings from the evaluation process, and which suited the firm’s objectives. Subsequently, the consultants were able to guide the firm through a successful RFP process, award and contract negotiations.

GAME-CHANGING $0 WITHDRAWAL FEE
A new service provider, GRM, was able to meet all the firm’s objectives and offer a zero-dollar withdrawal fee at the end of the ten-year contract period. “This result was an amazing, unforeseen outcome for us,” says Sherry, one that in her twenty years at the firm she had never seen. The new contract incorporated many other significant changes, such as:
- A single, firm-wide agreement.
- Improved pricing for storage and services in line with the market.
- Assistance with formerly cost-prohibitive permanent withdrawal fees.
- Reasonable retrieval and destruction rates as well as elimination of withdrawal fees entirely, which fit with the firm’s short and long-term inventory reduction goals.
- Fixed costs for first five years of the agreement. 4% fixed rate increases year over year thereafter.
- Agreeance to penalty-based service level agreements.

FIRM GAINS SAVINGS PLUS A 10 YEAR PLAN TO GET OUT OF OFF-SITE RECORDS
Sherry states, “Mattern was able to negotiate terms that were valuable enhancements. They were able to investigate the market in a way and to a depth that worked very well: we got contract terms we feel very good about. Everything they brought to the table was top-notch.” Through the Mattern process, the firm was able to enter into a firm-friendly contract that guaranteed Chamberlain Hrdlicka would see the savings it was anticipating and would coincide with its short and long-term records storage reduction goals.

The firm reduced its permanent withdrawal fees by 82% during the term of the agreement which will, at the contract’s expiration, be reduced by 100% while still being liable for a reduced retrieval fee. It is estimated the firm will save 40% over its current storage and service costs through the life of the agreement. Cumulatively the savings will allow Chamberlain Hrdlicka to implement the changes they need to ensure a streamlined, reduced off-site storage practice for all their locations well into the future.

Mattern was retained by the firm to oversee the transition from the incumbent storage services providers to the new seamless contract and to monitor and manage its implementation.

“Mattern provided us with insights and expertise that fundamentally shaped this exceptional outcome for the firm’s off-site storage contact negotiations,” states Sherry. “We were delighted with the process, the results and the follow-up. I would highly recommend Mattern to any firm.”

The procurement of office supplies is back to pre-pandemic levels and firms are once again looking to optimize their spend.  After years of decline due to hybrid work and the shift to digital output, the overall dollar spend is back, or in some cases, exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

AmLaw 200 Firm Streamlines Procurement and Saves 43% on Office Supplies

Establishing and maintaining a successful contract negotiation is a situation in which there needs to be two winners, not a winner and a loser. While every firm wants to procure the best contracts through informed negotiation, it is also important to preserve the long term, industry relationships with the vendors. You’ve got to pick the competitors wisely, and you must know the best practices in your region. To that end, there’s a great deal of strategy involved in an Open RFP; one might say an art.

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

Prominent IP Law Firm Achieves Win-Win & 10 Year Contract with Open Off-Site Records RFP

With more than 1,100 lawyers and consulting professionals in 24 offices worldwide, this firm is a leading business and litigation practice with global reach. As is the trend with many successful large firms, this particular one had undergone a merger in 2009 with an established Atlanta-based firm.

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

National Firm Gains 33% Reduction in Permanent Withdrawal Fees and 22% Monthly Savings on Outsourcing Contracts in Dual RFPs

Best Best & Krieger, LLP is a 180-attorney law firm that has been in business for more than a century. The firm has grown to include several dynamic practice groups across eight offices throughout California.

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Mattern & Associates Spearheads Vendor Consolidation, Achieves 23% Monthly Savings in Support Services for Best Best & Krieger

Established in 1891, Best Best & Krieger (BBK) is a highly regarded, full-service law firm of over 350 professionals, including more than 200 attorneys across nine offices in California and in Washington, D.C. Maria D’Aquila is the firm’s Operations Manager.

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

Mattern’s Phase III Contract Compliance Program Achieves Maximum Value for Best Best & Krieger’s Office Supplies Contracts

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Houston-based firm was in the throes of implementing a “work-cell” environment for their secretaries per practice area. The restructuring of staff and office layout required a different output strategy to be deployed in order to provide the tools and technology within close proximity to the work-cells, while also looking to reduce expenses. However, the firm had several expiration dates for their existing multi-function devices, requiring a creative plan for addressing replacements that also substantially improved the convenience and efficiency for the new work-cell environment.

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

AmLaw 200 Firm Shifts to Work-Cell Environment, Captures 24% in Cost Savings while Substantially Improving Operational Efficiency

This AmLaw 200, Chicago-based firm had taken advantage of outsourcing methods over the last couple of years; however, its current outsourcing and equipment contract was soon to expire. Since the firm renewed with the incumbent vendor the previous five years, they were interested in learning what other service bureaus were providing in the outsourcing marketplace. The firm also desired to determine whether they were staffed appropriately and operating under industry best practices and service levels with competitive pricing.

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

Chicago-based Firm Improves Workflow and Achieves 33% Annual Savings

This 250 attorney, Am Law 200, Washington D.C.-based firm had specific areas in which it was struggling; in particular, they were finding it difficult to keep current with technology, flexing to meet demand, and recovering costs for the internal systems and storage related to litigation support services (e-Discovery).

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

Am Law 200 Firm Gains Competitive Advantage and Charge Back Model to Recoup Costs for eDiscovery Managed Services

This 350 attorney, Am Law 200 firm based in Ohio had decided to outsource their in-sourced back-office operations and multi-function devices (MFDs) on a firm-wide basis five years prior. The contract was expiring and the firm was now considering outsourcing the on-site centralized Records and Information Management functions. As a result, the firm was interested in what other outsourcing companies’ capabilities were in the records space, how they may improve current services to the firm, and whether they had a competitive contract.

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

Am Law 200 Firm Saves on Costs, Improves Service Levels by Outsourcing Records and Selecting New MFD Vendor

This 250 attorney, AmLaw 200, Washington D.C.-based firm has 11 offices nationwide. The firm had multiple offsite records storage contracts in place and was interested in investigating cost-savings and efficiencies by consolidating vendors as well as creating a short and long-term strategy to reduce their offsite storage commitments.

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

Am Law 200 Firm Removes Permanent Withdrawal Fees, Consolidates Vendors and Saves 24% in Off-Site Record Storage

This 225 attorney, Nashville-based firm was looking to improve outsourcing workflow efficiencies, service level and increase equipment capabilities. The firm had been with its current outsourcing and equipment provider for over a decade and felt that the level of off-site management interaction and proactive presentation of strategic initiatives were minimal.

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings

Nashville-based Firm Improves Outsourcing Workflow Efficiencies, Service and Equipment Capabilities: Achieves 51% Savings

This 320 attorney, AmLaw 200, Kansas City-based firm was looking to implement changes in production workflow in order to maximize efficiencies and substantially reduce consumption and reliance on paper.  With the expiration of its current Canon Multi-Function Device (MFD) fleet pending as well as an aging printer fleet, the firm’s operations and IT teams were seeking a comprehensive solution to meet the current and future needs of the firm.

AmLaw 200 Firm Leverages Technology & Equipment to Improve Workflow, Saves $1 Million over 5 Years

AmLaw 200 Firm Leverages Technology & Equipment to Improve Workflow, Saves $1 Million over 5 Years

More Case Studies

bottom of page