top of page

When Admin Work Becomes “Everyone’s Job,” No One Owns the Outcome

  • Feb 4
  • 3 min read

Administrative inefficiency is often framed as a staffing problem. In our experience, the issue is more often ownership. When administrative work spreads across roles without clear boundaries, it becomes everyone’s responsibility and no one’s priority. That is when service becomes inconsistent, effort is duplicated, and frustration builds quietly across the firm.


Firms rarely make a conscious decision to operate this way. It happens gradually, and by the time leaders feel the symptoms, the root cause is no longer obvious.


How Administrative Work Slowly Diffuses Across Roles

It usually starts with good intentions. A paralegal helps cover an assistant who is overloaded. An attorney handles their own print or filing task to avoid a delay. A manager steps in to coordinate scheduling because it feels faster than delegating.


Over time, these small accommodations accumulate. The firm adapts informally, but roles and expectations are never formally realigned. Tasks are shared, covered, or bypassed entirely, but no one truly owns them anymore. What once lived in a defined role becomes background work absorbed wherever capacity exists.


Why “Pitching In” Is Not Always Helping

Helping out feels productive. It feels collaborative. But when administrative responsibilities are constantly traded and redistributed, the firm loses more than time.


Workarounds delay real fixes. Frustration builds between departments without a clear place to surface it. When service breaks down, leadership struggles to understand why because accountability is fragmented. What looks like teamwork on the surface often creates operational drag underneath.


The Cost of Unclear Ownership

When ownership and escalation paths are unclear, service quality varies. That variability may be tolerable for a while, but it eventually shows up in measurable ways.


Common consequences include duplicated or missed work, delays on time-sensitive requests, over-reliance on a small group of dependable individuals, poor visibility into true staffing needs, and hidden costs absorbed by attorneys and senior staff. These issues rarely appear in performance reviews or dashboards, but they show up in outcomes, morale, and client experience.


What Happens When Roles Are Reclarified

Firms that take the time to reestablish role clarity often see meaningful improvement quickly. Staff can focus on the work they were hired to do. Managers can evaluate performance fairly. Leadership gains a clearer picture of how support actually functions day to day.


This is not about rigid boundaries. It is about functional accountability, so the right work lands with the right role at the right time.


Case Study: Restoring Ownership Through Operational Clarity

A Boston-based firm, Burns & Levinson LLP, engaged Mattern when leadership wanted to evaluate whether key administrative services should remain outsourced or move in-house. What they lacked was a clear understanding of how work was actually being handled across roles and offices.


Mattern conducted a detailed review of administrative responsibilities, service coverage, and informal workflows. The analysis revealed that many tasks were being handled outside of defined roles, often by attorneys or senior staff stepping in to keep things moving. Ownership was fragmented, and service consistency varied by location and individual.


With clear visibility into who was doing what, the firm was able to reset expectations, clarify accountability, and evaluate service models with real data rather than assumptions. Leadership ultimately chose to remain outsourced, but restructured the engagement with clearer service definitions, escalation paths, and performance oversight.


The result was improved service consistency, stronger accountability, and a support model that aligned with how the firm actually worked. Most importantly, administrative work once again had clear owners. That’s Mattern engagement.


The Mattern Perspective

Fixing administrative inefficiency does not always require restructuring or adding headcount. Often, it starts with understanding how work is being owned, shifted, and absorbed across the firm.


At Mattern, we help law firms improve performance through clearer role definition, stronger governance, and practical operational insight. If your firm is struggling with support issues that feel hard to define, we can help you identify the real source. Contact info@matternassoc.com.

 
 
bottom of page